Reducing your employees to numbers

September 9, 2008

Another reference from Willem, this time to a reported attempt to create mathematical models of 50,000 of IBM’s tech consultants. Now I have not verified this one directly, but the article is from Business Week. The idea it seems is to automate management by capturing every aspects (keystrokes etc) of a persons life. Now there is no valid moral reason that I can think of that would justify this type of intrusive research. I suppose the redeeming feature is that a mathematical model could never do this in any practical (or for that matter theoretical) way or at least I hope it cannot. The justification given (my paraphrase) is as follows Imagine that your boss finally recognizes your strengths,then he puts you into situations where you will thrive. Now this does beyond scary it’s perverted. How did this ever through any ethical review committee? Was there even one in place? How can the 50,000 employees have given informed consent to this level of data capture? Do they know what is being done?

Please, would someone tell me this is an early April Fool? Maybe the story is exaggerated or just crude sensationalism? I sincerely hope so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

About the Cynefin Company

The Cynefin Company (formerly known as Cognitive Edge) was founded in 2005 by Dave Snowden. We believe in praxis and focus on building methods, tools and capability that apply the wisdom from Complex Adaptive Systems theory and other scientific disciplines in social systems. We are the world leader in developing management approaches (in society, government and industry) that empower organisations to absorb uncertainty, detect weak signals to enable sense-making in complex systems, act on the rich data, create resilience and, ultimately, thrive in a complex world.
ABOUT USSUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER

Cognitive Edge Ltd. & Cognitive Edge Pte. trading as The Cynefin Company and The Cynefin Centre.

© COPYRIGHT 2024

< Prev

Wikipedia, don’t offend the master(s) of the universe

I will confess to feeling slightly disappointed with Wikipedia today. We have one very good ...

More posts

Next >

Do you know your mad scientists?

My knowledge of mad scientists proved limited. I only managed to scrape by with 50% ...

More posts

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram