<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Cognitive Edge</title>
      <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/</link>
      <description>Headquartered in Singapore, Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd was created in 2006 to take on the work originally initiated in IBM as the Cynefin Centre for Organisational Complexity.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:56:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Maneggiare</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Tom Davenport has <a href="http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/davenport/2008/07/does_management_mean_command_a_2.html">cast</a> the cold water of sanity on those who conflate management with command and control and venerate bottom up spontaneous self organisation.  The trigger is the much talked about <a href="http://www.knowledgeboard.com/item/2860/23/5/3">shift of IBM</a> from knowledge management to knowledge sharing, something claimed by IBM as a "philosophical repositioning".<br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Now I take this claim not just with a pinch of salt, but the whole god damn cellar and ideally most of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_in_Cheshire">mining output</a> of Cheshire, especially the<em> its not about the tools its about the people</em> claim given that most of the PR seems to be around IBM's technology or technology enabled services.  Now IBM is no exception to any other large company in this respect and its good to see my good friend <a href="http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/elsua">Luis Suarez </a>getting some exposure within Big Blue so don't take my comments as a criticism per se.  The reality is that the official practice in IBM has finally caught up with the reality of informal networking that was far more important than the KM databases, CoPs etc. that IBM enthusiastically adopted behind the market curve when I was there.</p>

<p>The point is (to complement Tom) that IBM really has not given up on management nor are they likely to at any point in the future.  Yes they have freed up blogging etc. within their firewalls and should pick up a gold star for that, but that was a management decision.  A lot of management is about determining boundaries and IBM have shifted those a bit.  Micro-managment of all actions, command and control in the popular sense (which implies micro-management) are rarely in play in any modern organisation.  It was a management decision that provided the technology and funded the team that manage (that word) again the process.  Yes sharing will take place, but they have not moved from management to sharing just a different management focus.</p>

<p>Tom makes the point that the two extremes of anarchistic or chaotic self-organisation and micro-management of command and control are just that, extremes that rarely exist in reality for any length of time.  In effect all management is complex, a system of constraints in which behaviour modifies the nature of the system itself over time. OK it would be good if managers stopped failing to manage outcomes and recognised that success is better achieved by <a href="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/3cs_of_complexity.php#more">managing constraints and connectivity with a view to coherence</a>.   Killing sick stigma and other anally retentive process &#38; outcome based targets would help a lot as they are examples of contextually inappropriate management techniques.  But does anyone seriously argue that an organisation can survive without management?</p>

<p>Readers of this blog will also remember that the origin of management is <a href="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2006/10/a_return_to_manege_rather_than.php">meneggiare</a>, the ability to ride and train horses.  lets given up on silly statements about the end of management and focus in stead on changing management practice.<br />
</p>]]>
</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/maneggiare.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/maneggiare.php</guid>
         <category>Polemic</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:56:22 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Adult games</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am coming to a growing realisation that active editing of the Wikipedia is a different form of multi-user computer game.  Ok it has a purpose, to create a meaningful and useful artifact but participation is enjoyable, increases interaction with other people (who you get to know in different ways, some good, some bad) and generally is fun.  Clans emerge with particular ideologies: I am having problems with a group I call the geography-facists at the moment, a clan characterised by their desire for uniformity at all costs.  Alliances form to hunt down Trolls (an exact parallel) and sock puppets (I am sure there are deceivers in on line games).  Mentors exist to help out new people and you can build credit and status.  All the characteristics of a game.</p>

<p>To complete the picture there are rules (the need for citations) and ethics (assume good faith) and if you fall foul of those you serve a time out.  You can choose the level; in the last two months a group of us have argued at length over two words on the philosophy page, while a pitched fight broke out over the British Isles as a geographical term given the politics of the relationship between Britain and Ireland.  Don't make the mistake of thinking to call it a game is any denigration of its seriousness by the way.</p>

<p>I will have to stop telling my 16 year off for spending too much time on his computer playing games if I am to avoid a legitimate charge of hypocrisy.<br />
</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/adult_games.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/adult_games.php</guid>
         <category>Musings</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:52:47 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>3Cs of complexity</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>My mind was activated by a head wind and rain walking between the domestic and international terminals at Auckland en route to Vancouver.  Remembering back to the good old 3Ps of marketing I realised I have been in effect developing something similar around complexity so here goes.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<ul><li><strong><em>Constraint</em></strong> is key to understanding complexity, it governs the transition between the three ontologies.  Increase constraint and you create an ordered system; over constrain you create the conditions for catastrophic failure; remove constraint and the system is chaotic.  Managing constrains is one of the things you can train managers to do, and possible measure (working on that one at the moment).</li><li><strong><em>Coherence</em></strong> is the measure and concept by which you judge the validity of an action in a complex domain.  A lightly constrained system modifies as agents interact with it, but it does constrain.  The constant change means that is it difficult to provide absolute proof of an idea or approach (by the time you did the situation would have changed), but it is possible to create tests (including mathematical tests) of the degree of coherence that an idea has.</li><li><strong><em>Connectivity</em></strong> is key to a complex system, where agent proximity has a massive impact on agent action.  Of course the nature of connections is also key (just connecting things is not enough.  If I increase connectivity I can increase variety and thence novelty by the right selection of links.  But I can also increase connectivity of like with like if I want to exploit existing knowledge.  I may generate a higher or lower degree of coherence, or at least test my ability to do so.</li></ul>

<p>Not completely there yet (and there may be some more to add) but its a start</p>]]>
</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/3cs_of_complexity.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/3cs_of_complexity.php</guid>
         <category>Musings</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:28:15 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Trying to trace an adventure story</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A long time ago, when I was young I came across a book (or series of books) in the local library that were adventure stories about the Maori Wars.  They featured a hero who fought with a Bowie knife with Maori, against Maori.  I think they may have been based in part of <a href="http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/M/MairGilbert/MairGilbert/en">Gilbert Mair</a> but I am not sure.  Now I just remember enjoying them and the odd flash of memory, but I would like to find them again.  Now they may for all I remember have been racist!   I will confess to having read the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biggles">Biggles</a> books when young; now they were racist, imperialist, sexist etc. but somehow that is not my recollection of the elusive adventure series.  Enquiries all week in New Zealand have not resulted in any memories.  Anyone out there have any idea?<br />
</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/trying_to_trace_an_adventure_s.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/trying_to_trace_an_adventure_s.php</guid>
         <category>Requests</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:43:03 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vancouver get together</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Due to the postponement of a client project I will now be in Vancouver early  next week rather than California.  We have organised a get together for the network.  Details below and please let <a href="mailto:liessi.haussler@cyberscribe.ca">Liessi Haussler</a> know if you are planning to come.  It will take place at 1730 and last for a couple of hours.  Location is  <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;q=doolins+pub&amp;near=Vancouver,+BC,+Canada&amp;fb=1&amp;cid=0,0,14218160385617111881&amp;ll=49.282364,-123.122535&amp;spn=0.01229,0.026608&amp;z=15&amp;iwloc=A">Doolin’s Irish Pub</a>, on Nelson Street between Granville and Seymour<br />
</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/vancouver_get_together.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/vancouver_get_together.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:56:17 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Social constructivism</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It is surely illogical for someone to walk out on you because you suggest that Social Constructivists should wake up the fact that reality exists.  Surely if you think everything is socially constructed then someone saying it doesn't is their own reality and equally valid?</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/social_constructivism.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/social_constructivism.php</guid>
         <category>Trivia</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:34:23 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Museum Hotel</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Another <a href="http://www.museumhotel.co.nz/">good design hotel</a> - this time in Wellington right opposite <a href="http://www.tepapa.govt.nz/Tepapa/English/">Te Papa</a> and in easy walking distance of the <a href="http://www.dineout.co.nz/restaurant.php?rest=2476&amp;restaurant_name=Felix">Felix Café</a>  which does one of the best breakfasts in the world; I will be there in the morning.   The gourmet burger  at the hotel is to die for and it comes with a very good local dark lager. <br />
</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/museum_hotel.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/museum_hotel.php</guid>
         <category>Great places</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:15:59 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Once upon a time</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am just completing a chapter  for a book on <em>Organizational Memory</em>. It is due today US time, and I am 16 hours ahead in New Zealand so I may make it!  I am arguing strongly for a fragmented and dynamic approach to memory, rather than that static approach represented by content focused KM approaches and (as mad and bad) recording and archiving of complete stories from people as they approach retirement.   For the moment I thought I would share the opening two paragraphs<br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<blockquote><em>Once upon a time</em> when people joined organisations with the reasonable expectation of a job of life, apprenticeships were common place and indirect communication was limited to the office memo and the telephone; not many people talked about organisational memory.    In an earlier age the oral tradition allowed complex knowledge to evolve through the interaction of those stories with the day to day realities of living; then the very idea of organisational knowledge would have been incomprehensible.   In both of these cases knowledge was a living, evolving entity not a static repository of information.  In the West our oral tradition suffered at the hands of Hans Christian Andersen and the Brothers Grimm who wrote down the stories, so that in the modern day they seem quaint, they have not evolved.  A decade of knowledge management practice has focused on a largely forlorn attempt to codify what people know into best practice documents.  Even those who adopt the use of story seem to have a tendency to create archive recordings of material.  The living, evolving and creatively messy tradition of our near and distant ancestors appears lost in an over enthusiastic attempt to create highly “chunked” knowledge artifacts at the expense of knowledge dynamics and learning.</blockquote>

<blockquote>In this chapter I will outline an approach to organisational memory which recognises the importance of fine granularity knowledge objects, linked and connected to current realities.  I will emphasis the need for serendipitous and contextual encounters with any such knowledge objects, and the need to modify and blend them <em>on the fly</em>.  In doing this I will look at the impact of social computing on the field of knowledge management and the use of narrative databases which together and to a degree mirror the oral tradition and apprentice models of knowledge transfer and creation.  I will do this by introducing a set of theoretical arguments, in part drawn from the natural sciences to set the scene.  This will be followed by a brief summary criticism of existing approaches in the field and will then conclude by elaborating the approach summarised at the start of this paragraph.</blockquote>

<p>All any any comments and questions welcome</p>]]>
</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/once_upon_a_time.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/once_upon_a_time.php</guid>
         <category>Musings</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:23:12 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New course structure, and first in Amsterdam</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Steve and I just finished work on a new training course structure.  We have taken the current three day course and stripped out all the SenseMaker™ material into a new one day programme.  The rest of the narrative, networks and complexity material is now part of a two day course which provides accreditation, with a strong recommendation to attend the third SenseMaker™ day if people want to run narrative software projects.   That third day will also be available at low cost to all existing practitioners who want to learn how to configure, sell and interpret narrative projects that use the software.   This also means we are clearly separating the open-source method material from software.  The early roll out of this is planned for <a href="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/eventsdetail.php?eventid=53">Amsterdam this September</a> with a November cluster in Copenhagen, London and Boston proceeded by Singapore in October.</p>

<p>Amsterdam provides an opportunity to attend from most of Europe with easy connections to Schipol Airport and thence into the city centre where the course will be held.  A chance not only for new people, but also for existing practitioners to catch up with SenseMaker™</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/new_course_structure_and_first.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/new_course_structure_and_first.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:28:35 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>1 Peter 5:8</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Wikipedia is a fascinating example of a complex system and I am enjoying editing it far more than most listservs.   Yes the controversies can be lame, it has taken over a month to resolve the wording of the opening sentence on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy">Philosophy</a> in a discussion that has resembled mediaeval debates as to the number of angels that could stand on the had of a pin, but we got there.  The edit-wars and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29">sockpuppetry</a> on all pages relating to the national status of Wales, Scotland, England and Ireland represents a constant challenge, but <em>right</em> seems to win out in the end.  My latest enterprise is to see if the article on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming">NLP</a>, one of the great <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo_science">pseudosciences</a> of our time, can be improved.   I essayed a few minor edits this morning and will await developments.  </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>One of my real concerns here is the frequent conflation of Cognitive Edge methods with NLP and that other current popular method <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciative_inquiry">Appreciative Inquiry</a> (AI).  Now there is a big difference.  My concern about AI is that it privileges one type of story over an other.  Why should anyone tell people what type of stories they should tell?  Despite my disagreements I can respect its practitioners and see that it has utility in constrained circumstances.  Its attraction to managers is obvious with the <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1loyjm4SOa0">Always look on the bright side of life</a></em> philosophy; but it has its time and place. NLP on the other hand represents at best one of those false evolutionary paths than humans go down from time to time; at worst it is a manipulative cult.  A good summary can be found in the ever useful <a href="http://skepdic.com/neurolin.html">Skeptics Dictionary</a>, and there is also a <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20021216094638/http:/easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~dylanwad/morganic/art_nlp.htm">body</a> of scientific evidence that its basic assumptions are flawed so I should be surprised that it still has adherents.  </p>

<p>However the human race seems very willing to seize onto self-help therapies that abscond with some misunderstood concepts drawn from a shallow reading of scientific literature.  It may be evident of a flawed need for certainty, or evidence of the need for some source of meaning in the face of uncertainty.  Whatever it is dangerous, the uncritical adoption of a set of ideas is the starting and ending point of cultism, from which (and I appreciate the irony) <em>Good Lord preserve us</em>.  As St Peter says <em>Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour</em>.  </p>]]>
</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/1_peter_58.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/1_peter_58.php</guid>
         <category>Polemic</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:27:58 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Four interesting and one scary link</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting blogs that are worth reading. I stored them in the hope of using them to stimulate a reflective blog (and may still do so) but for the moment I share them.<br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2008/06/6_iconoclastic_discoveries_about_the_brain.php">6 iconoclastic discoveries about the brain</a> from Neuro<em>philosophy</em>, and number 5 puts the kibosh on ideas that computers and the brain are similar.</p>

<p>A wonderful series in Nature which attempts a scientific explanation of music, all nine parts available <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/scienceandmusic/pdfs/scienceandmusic.pdf">here</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/12/cosmic-monster-n44-by-don-goldman/">Cosmic monster</a>, a great picture not to mention a fascinating explanation</p>

<p>Neuro<em>philosophy </em><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/">again</a> on the way in which Shakespeare's use of functional shift and its impact on the brain.</p>

<p>Finally the <a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/6537">really scary stuff</a>.  I found this tracking down the background of one disruptive editor on the Wikipedia article on Philosophy.<br />
</p>]]>
</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/four_interesting_and_one_scary.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/four_interesting_and_one_scary.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:20:27 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Of undercooked sausages, tugboats and turgidity</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/P1010023_2.JPG" onclick="window.open('http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/P1010023_2.JPG','popup','width=2931,height=1342,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/P1010023_2-tm.jpg" height="137" width="300" border="0" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="P1010023.JPG copy" title="P1010023.JPG copy" /></a>Too many days without blogging.  I feel I have failed in some way neglecting an important aspect of my life.  I think it's a mixture of stress guilt about not completing one article and a very full programme over the last few days.  Yesterday was a bit more relaxed (although less so the night).  Landing in Auckland midday I got the bus into the centre and settled into an <a href="http://www.aucklandwaterfront.co.nz/location.htm">apartment</a> with a harbour view (see above). <br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>A walk into town to pick up some pre-ordered merino rollnecks from one of my <a href="http://www.fashionz.co.nz/untouchedworld/">favorite shops</a> followed.  I then bought a bottle of Pinot, toulouse sausage and bread from the delicatessen at the foot of Queen Street.  I then settled down on the sofa to watch a pretty turgid match between the ABs and the Boks: <em>bring back northern hemisphere rugby, at least the backs run the ball</em>.  Thence to bed and the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Last-Augury-Island-Empire/dp/0552139807">final book</a> in Jonathan Wylie's fantasy trilogy <em>Island and Empire</em> (a good undemanding read). </p>

<p>The night was less peaceful as I rather rushed the sausage cooking in order to be sat down for<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd0kDxP04eI"> the Haka</a>.  Morning saw the water the harbour calm (in contrast with my stomach) and I had the pleasure of watching two small tug boats deftly maneuver a much larger ship under the bridge and into dock.  The sun is out, it is Sunday, I have a water view and (praise be to God) it is refreshingly cold and breezy and I plan an intensive writing session followed by a walk and hopefully (if the after effects of not cooking the sausage fully wear off) a meal with friends tonight.   Expect more serious cogitations from tomorrow.<br />
</p>]]>
</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/of_undercooked_sausages_tugboa.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/of_undercooked_sausages_tugboa.php</guid>
         <category>Trivia</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 22:28:42 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Public lecture Auckland University</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I will be giving a public lecture next week at the University of Auckland Business School at 1800 Tuesday 15th July.  It's an open lecture and the subject is <strong><em>COMPLEXITY SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL SYSTEMS: NEW APPROACHES TO STRATEGY AND RESEARCH.</em></strong>  If you want to go then send an email to <a href="mailto:PTudor@tonkin.co.nz">Paul</a>.<br />
</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/public_lecture_auckland_univer.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/public_lecture_auckland_univer.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:35:10 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Australasian network access</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have winged on several occasions about internet charges and facilities in Australasia and this trip is no exception.   My<a href="http://www.theoaksgroup.com.au/Property.aspx?sid=1"> current location</a> has excellent good quality facilities, but internet access is another matter.  One optionis  a weak wireless signal with a charging rate that is extortionate to say the least, not only for time but with a very low megabyte limit.  The other is a broadband cable that will stretch to the sofa, but not the desk and runs at 30kb/second.   It's no way to create a working environment, but it is around the norm.  I keep thinking year on year that it may change, but I begin to despair that it ever will.</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/australasian_network_access.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/australasian_network_access.php</guid>
         <category>Polemic</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:14:18 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Interesting uses of Cynefin</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Technorati threw out two blogs this morning which reference the Cynefin framework.  Both are interesting and worth a read.  The <a href="http://servicefab.blogspot.com/2008/07/thinking-adaptive-and-adoptive-over.html">first</a> uses it to explain the need for Fish and Chips at a pub in a village near St Albans (where I lived for several years and still miss).  The <a href="http://tarrysingh.blogspot.com/2008/07/windows7-and-microsofts-strategy-real.html">second</a> with Microsoft's virtualization strategy.  There are more and more of these types of references coming through at the moment, the HBR article having created a lot of interest and some fascinating applications as people pick up the ideas.  Another I liked recently was this one on <em><a href="http://worththefeetoreadit.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/who-we-are-a-guide-for-perplexed-canadians/">perplexed canadians</a></em> which uses the name if not the model.<br />
</p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/interesting_uses_of_cynefin.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2008/07/interesting_uses_of_cynefin.php</guid>
         <category>Musings</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:40:00 +0100</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
